1998 Rover Mini vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1117 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 506 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini. 2010 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover Mini has manual transmission. 1998 Rover Mini will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: