1998 Rover Mini vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 593 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Cube (172 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover Mini | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | Mini | Cube |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 172 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |