1998 Rover Mini vs. 2012 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2012 Seat Exeo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Seat Exeo (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Seat Exeo weights approximately 704 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Seat Exeo (148 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2012 Seat Exeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Rover Mini | 2012 Seat Exeo | |
| Make | Rover | Seat |
| Model | Mini | Exeo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1400 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2642 mm |
