1998 Saturn SC vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 Saturn SC is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Saturn SC (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Saturn SC weights approximately 275 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Saturn SC (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Saturn SC | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Saturn | Zastava |
| Model | SC | 102 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2160 mm |
