1998 Seat Bolero vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Seat Bolero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Seat Bolero would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Seat Bolero (350 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (270 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero should accelerate faster than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Seat Bolero | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Seat | Cadillac |
| Model | Bolero | CTS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2799 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 270 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
