1998 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1998 Seat Inca Kombi has manual transmission. 1998 Seat Inca Kombi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Seat Inca Kombi | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Seat | Holden |
| Model | Inca Kombi | Epica |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1391 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
