1998 SsangYong Musso vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 SsangYong Musso | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | SsangYong | Volkswagen |
Model | Musso | Polo |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1462 mm |