1998 Suzuki Vitara vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Suzuki Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Suzuki Vitara would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Suzuki Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Suzuki Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1998 Suzuki Vitara has manual transmission. 1998 Suzuki Vitara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Suzuki Vitara | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Suzuki | Honda |
Model | Vitara | CR-V |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 184 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1645 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2620 mm |