1998 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (208 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1998 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 90 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (407 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Toyota 4Runner. (295 Nm). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Toyota 4Runner | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | 4Runner | S60 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 93.2 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |