1998 Toyota Caldina vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Caldina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Caldina would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Caldina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Caldina (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Caldina weights approximately 870 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Toyota Caldina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Caldina (324 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Toyota Caldina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano. 1998 Toyota Caldina has automatic transmission and 2010 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2010 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Toyota Caldina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Toyota Caldina | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Toyota | Tata |
| Model | Caldina | Nano |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1975 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |
