1998 Toyota Caldina vs. 2012 Renault Logan
To start off, 2012 Renault Logan is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Caldina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Caldina would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Caldina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Caldina (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2012 Renault Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Caldina weights approximately 405 kg more than 2012 Renault Logan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Toyota Caldina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Logan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Caldina (324 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Logan. (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1998 Toyota Caldina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Logan. 1998 Toyota Caldina has automatic transmission and 2012 Renault Logan has manual transmission. 2012 Renault Logan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Toyota Caldina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Toyota Caldina | 2012 Renault Logan | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | Caldina | Logan |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |