1998 Toyota Camry vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 1998 Toyota Camry is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Camry (135 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Camry (196 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1998 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Toyota Camry | 1986 Acura Integra | |
Make | Toyota | Acura |
Model | Camry | Integra |
Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 196 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1665 mm |