1998 Toyota Century vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Century would be higher. At 5,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Century is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Toyota Century is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Toyota Century. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Toyota Century has automatic transmission and 2009 Volvo C70 has manual transmission. 2009 Volvo C70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Toyota Century will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Toyota Century | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Century | C70 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |