1998 Toyota Chaser vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Chaser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Chaser would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1998 Toyota Chaser.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Toyota Chaser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1998 Toyota Chaser has manual transmission. 1998 Toyota Chaser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Toyota Chaser | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Chaser | XC90 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1897 mm |