1998 Toyota Chaser vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Chaser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Chaser would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Chaser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 110 kg more than 1998 Toyota Chaser.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Toyota Chaser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Toyota Chaser | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Chaser | Juke |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |