1998 Toyota Crown vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Toyota Crown | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | Crown | Megane |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2050 mm |