1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser would be higher.
Because 1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser (391 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Toyota Mega Cruiser | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Toyota | Smart |
| Model | Mega Cruiser | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 391 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2290 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3400 mm | 1867 mm |
