1998 Toyota RAV4 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1998 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota RAV4 (126 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Toyota RAV4 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | RAV4 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |
