1998 Volkswagen Fusca vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volkswagen Fusca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volkswagen Fusca would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Volkswagen Fusca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Citi (72 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1998 Volkswagen Fusca. (52 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi should accelerate faster than 1998 Volkswagen Fusca.
Because 1998 Volkswagen Fusca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Volkswagen Fusca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Citi (108 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volkswagen Fusca. (106 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Citi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volkswagen Fusca.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Volkswagen Fusca | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volkswagen |
Model | Fusca | Citi |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2410 mm |