1998 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Express is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Express is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Express. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Express has automatic transmission and 1998 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1998 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Express will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Volkswagen Polo | 2010 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Volkswagen | Chevrolet |
Model | Polo | Express |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2073 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3429 mm |