1998 Volvo S80 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1998 Volvo S80. (178 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 187 kg more than 1998 Volvo S80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo S80. (240 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo S80.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Volvo S80 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Volvo Cadillac
Model S80 CTS
Year Released 1998 2013
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 178 HP 266 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 77 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.3
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.8 seconds 7.3 seconds
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1581 kg 1768 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.9 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.4 L/100km 13 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 16.1 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]