1999 AC Ace vs. 2001 BMW Z22
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Ace (351 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1999 AC Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Ace (400 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 1999 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22. 2001 BMW Z22 has automatic transmission and 1999 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1999 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z22 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Ace | 2001 BMW Z22 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Ace | Z22 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 3169 cc |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1615 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 63 L |