1999 AC Ace vs. 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Ace would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Ace | 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| Make | AC | Suzuki |
| Model | Ace | Grand Vitara |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 66 L |
