1999 AC Aceca vs. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (322 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 10 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | AC | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Aceca | 6C |
Year Released | 1999 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 77 L |