1999 AC Aceca vs. 1949 Holden FX
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 295 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 638 kg more than 1949 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 1949 Holden FX | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Aceca | FX |
Year Released | 1999 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2620 mm |