1999 AC Aceca vs. 1951 Allard J2
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1951 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 530 kg more than 1951 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 1951 Allard J2 | |
| Make | AC | Allard |
| Model | Aceca | J2 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 5415 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 38 L |
