1999 AC Aceca vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 522 kg more than 1999 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | AC | Humber |
Model | Aceca | Pullman |
Year Released | 1999 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3330 mm |