1999 AC Aceca vs. 1952 Bugatti Type 101
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (322 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 70 kg more than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 1952 Bugatti Type 101 | |
| Make | AC | Bugatti |
| Model | Aceca | Type 101 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3257 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1440 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3310 mm |
