1999 AC Aceca vs. 1961 DKW Munga
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 394 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 1961 DKW Munga | |
| Make | AC | DKW |
| Model | Aceca | Munga |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 31 L |
