1999 AC Aceca vs. 1965 NSU Autonova
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1965 NSU Autonova. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Autonova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 875 kg more than 1965 NSU Autonova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 1965 NSU Autonova | |
Make | AC | NSU |
Model | Aceca | Autonova |
Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 66.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 37 L |