1999 AC Aceca vs. 1980 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 175 kg more than 1980 Buick Skyhawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 1999 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1999 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 1980 Buick Skyhawk | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Aceca | Skyhawk |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |
