1999 AC Aceca vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (322 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 688 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1999 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1999 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | AC | Volvo |
| Model | Aceca | 66 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
