1999 AC Aceca vs. 1982 BMW 328
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 4 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (532 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328. 1982 BMW 328 has automatic transmission and 1999 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1999 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 BMW 328 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 1982 BMW 328 | |
| Make | AC | BMW |
| Model | Aceca | 328 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 532 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1506 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2840 mm |
