1999 AC Aceca vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 430 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1999 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2630 mm |