1999 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Mustang would be higher. Both 1999 AC Aceca and 1997 Ford Mustang are equipped with a 4,600 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 574 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 AC Aceca. (407 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Mustang |
Year Released | 1999 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2580 mm |