1999 AC Aceca vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 165 kg more than 1999 AC Aceca.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Sierra. (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
Make | AC | GMC |
Model | Aceca | Sierra |
Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3030 mm |