1999 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 510 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Aceca | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 4996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2680 mm |
