1999 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2000 Toyota Caserta is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 674 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Aceca | Caserta |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 936 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |
