1999 AC Aceca vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (322 HP) has 145 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 1999 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X20 has automatic transmission and 1999 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1999 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2001 MG X20 | |
Make | AC | MG |
Model | Aceca | X20 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |