1999 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | Outlander |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 59 L |