1999 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur
To start off, 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur (551 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1999 AC Aceca. (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur should accelerate faster than 1999 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur weights approximately 865 kg more than 1999 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur (650 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur | |
Make | AC | Bentley |
Model | Aceca | Continental Flying Spur |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 551 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 650 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5310 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 100 L |