1999 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (322 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1999 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (532 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | AC | Kia |
Model | Aceca | K2700 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 532 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |