1999 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1999 AC Aceca.

Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

1999 AC Aceca 2009 Mazda BT-50
Make AC Mazda
Model Aceca BT-50
Year Released 1999 2009
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 2606 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 301 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1510 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 50 L