1999 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 430 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Aceca | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2550 mm |
