1999 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (301 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2011 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1999 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1999 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |