1999 AC Aceca vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 923 more horse power than 1999 AC Aceca. (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1999 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 360 kg more than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | AC | SSC |
| Model | Aceca | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 1269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6075 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1090 mm |
