1999 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Audi S6
To start off, 2012 Audi S6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S6 (414 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1999 AC Aceca. (322 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1999 AC Aceca.
Because 2012 Audi S6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (532 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi S6. (500 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi S6.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2012 Audi S6 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | S6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 414 HP |
Torque | 532 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |