1999 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1999 AC Aceca. (322 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1999 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (532 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Aceca | UTE |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 532 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
