1999 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Aceca (322 HP) has 166 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 1999 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Peugeot RCZ has automatic transmission and 1999 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1999 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | AC | Peugeot |
| Model | Aceca | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1359 mm |
