1999 AC Cobra vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 AC Cobra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Cobra (365 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1999 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Cobra | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Cobra | 62 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 365 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 79 L |
